Vendor Comparison

How Vermont AI compares — honestly.

We won't tell you ChatGPT Enterprise is bad. We'll tell you exactly when it's the right choice and when private AI is.

Highlight:
Dimension Vermont AI Systems Private ChatGPT Enterprise Copilot for M365 DIY In-house
Data Isolation Dedicated infrastructure
Your data runs on your own VPC or on-prem — never shared multi-tenant.
Shared multi-tenant
Data processed on OpenAI's shared infrastructure. Enterprise terms apply but infrastructure is shared.
Tenant-isolated within M365
Data stays within your Microsoft 365 tenant boundary, not across tenants.
Depends on your team
As isolated as your team builds it. Could be excellent — or not.
Public LLM Training Exposure None
Your data is never used to train any external model, period.
Opt-out available
Enterprise tier excludes training by default, but you're relying on OpenAI's policy.
None
Microsoft commits to not training on M365 tenant data.
Configurable
If you're calling external APIs (e.g., OpenAI), exposure depends on your config.
Year 1 Cost (typical) $84,500–$120K+
$7.5K assessment + $35–75K build + $42K retainer. Scales with complexity.
$36K–$144K
$30/user/month × 100–400 seats. No setup cost, no custom model.
$36K–$120K
$30/user/month (or bundled in E3/E5). Often already licensed.
$250K–$1M+
Eng salary, GPU infra, fine-tuning, MLOps pipeline, ongoing maintenance.
Time to First Production Use Case ~90 days
Assessment → build → deploy in a single focused engagement.
2–4 weeks
SaaS model. Fastest path to broad rollout for general productivity.
4–8 weeks
Native M365 integration accelerates rollout if tenant is already on E3/E5.
6–12 months
Hiring, infra provisioning, model selection, MLOps setup, testing — it adds up.
Custom Model Fine-Tuning on Your Data Yes — exclusively yours
Model is fine-tuned on your proprietary data. You own the weights.
No
Enterprise tier doesn't include custom fine-tuning on your data.
Limited
Copilot can use SharePoint/OneDrive content via retrieval, but no model fine-tuning.
Yes — owned
Full control, but requires ML engineering team to execute.
Regulatory Fit
ABA Model Rule 1.6
GLBA / SOC 2
NAIC Model Law
ITAR (with controls)
HIPAA-ready
⚠️ABA 1.6 — bar association guidance varies
GLBA — BAA available
⚠️NAIC — insurer discretion
ITAR — not authorized
HIPAA — BAA available
⚠️ABA 1.6 — M365 tenant isolation helps but not definitive
GLBA — covered by M365 compliance center
⚠️NAIC — depends on implementation
ITAR — not certified
HIPAA — BAA available
ABA 1.6 — if built correctly
GLBA — configurable
NAIC — configurable
ITAR — possible with air-gap
HIPAA — configurable
M365 / Google Workspace Integration Yes, via API
We connect to your existing tools. Not native — requires integration config during build.
Native to M365 / OpenAI ecosystem
Plugins, GPTs, and Microsoft's Copilot partnership make integration tight.
Native to M365
Copilot lives inside Teams, Outlook, Word, Excel. Zero friction if you're M365-native.
Build it yourself
You wire up every connector. Could be done well — but adds months.
Internal IP Risk (Employee Data Pasting) Minimal — no external egress
Employees interact with a private model. Data never leaves the VPC.
Moderate — policy-dependent
Enterprise mode limits training, but data still transits OpenAI's infra. Employees may not know what's sensitive.
Low within M365 boundary
Data stays in-tenant. Risk is M365 oversharing, not external egress.
Depends on architecture
Fully internal if you use a local model. Risk exists if you proxy to an external API.
Vendor Lock-in None — you own the weights
Model weights, fine-tuning data, and deployment config transfer to you at project close. Month-to-month retainer.
High
Your workflows, integrations, and institutional muscle memory are tied to OpenAI's platform and pricing.
High
Deep M365 integration means switching costs compound over time. You're in Microsoft's ecosystem.
None
You own everything. But the lock-in becomes your team's continued employment and attention.
Audit Trail / Compliance Logging Built-in, exportable
Every query, response, and data access is logged. Exportable for eDiscovery or compliance audit.
Available in Enterprise tier
Conversation export and admin audit logs available — not always in the format regulators expect.
Via Microsoft Purview
Compliance logging through Purview. Requires proper configuration — not on by default.
Build it
Logging infrastructure is your responsibility. Gets complex fast under HIPAA or GLBA.
Support Model Tim + team, direct access
You're talking to the people who built your model. No tickets, no tier-1 queue.
Tiered enterprise support
Priority support with SLAs available at Enterprise. Routed through account management.
M365 / Microsoft support
Standard M365 enterprise support. Copilot-specific issues may require specialist escalation.
Internal team only
You own the support burden. That team has a lot of other things to do.
Best For Regulated industries, IP-sensitive operations, audit pressure
If a breach or compliance failure would be career-ending, this is the right choice.
Broad productivity, low-sensitivity data, fast rollout
Great for general-purpose productivity where data isn't regulated or competitively sensitive.
M365-native shops, productivity assist, not a competitive differentiator
Best when you're already deep in Microsoft and want AI inside the tools you use daily.
Companies with permanent ML teams and $5M+ AI budgets
If you have the people and budget to own this indefinitely, DIY gives maximum control.

When to choose each option

Vermont AI Systems

When privacy isn't optional

  • Regulated industry: law, insurance, finance, healthcare, defense
  • Trade secrets or proprietary processes that can't leave the building
  • Audit pressure — you need a provable chain of custody
  • Prior public LLM incident or near-miss you can't repeat
  • Board or counsel has flagged AI as a compliance risk

ChatGPT Enterprise

When broad productivity is the goal

  • General-purpose productivity: writing, summarization, code assist
  • Data isn't regulated or competitively sensitive
  • You need to roll out to hundreds of users in weeks, not months
  • Org is already familiar with ChatGPT from personal use

Copilot for M365

When you're M365-native and that's fine

  • Team lives in Teams, Outlook, Word, Excel all day
  • AI is productivity assist, not a competitive differentiator
  • Already licensed for E3 or E5 — marginal cost is low
  • No plans to use AI on sensitive or proprietary data

DIY In-house

When you have the team and the runway

  • Permanent ML engineering team already on staff
  • AI is core to your product — not just internal tooling
  • $5M+ AI budget and 12+ month timeline is realistic
  • You want maximum flexibility and zero external dependencies

Still comparing? Two next steps.

Neither of these requires a sales call. Use them to sharpen your own thinking.

Model the 3-year cost → 30-min review with Tim →